Trump's Midterm Power Grab Meets Pluto's Gaze

The planets do not care about American politics, but they seem to be watching closely nonetheless. As the nation approaches the midterm elections of November 3, 2026, the sky has arranged itself into a configuration that would give any mundane astrologer pause. Saturn and Neptune have converged in the earliest degrees of Aries—a conjunction that occurs roughly every thirty-six years and has historically coincided with periods when collective illusions are either shattered or calcified into new b

The correspondence between these celestial patterns and the political moment feels almost too on-the-nose. The Saturn-Neptune conjunction in Aries—a sign associated with leadership, initiative, conflict, and the will to assert—suggests a period when established boundaries become permeable, when reality itself becomes subject to reinterpretation. Neptune dissolves what Saturn would structure; Saturn attempts to give form to Neptune's dreams and delusions. In Aries, this tension plays out across the terrain of leadership and identity. The question becomes not merely what is true, but who has the power to define truth itself.

This is not abstract symbolism divorced from earthly concerns. The political landscape of 2026 carries echoes of a recent past that many Americans would prefer to forget but cannot. The January 6th Select Committee documented in painstaking detail how tens of millions of Americans had been persuaded by President Trump that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen by overwhelming fraud. The committee's language was carefully chosen: they recognized this persuasion as a foundational fact, not a matter of debate. The celestial patterns of 2026 suggest that this foundational fracture in American consensus reality continues to shape the national trajectory.

On January 2, 2021, Trump placed a telephone call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger that would become one of the most scrutinized pieces of evidence in subsequent investigations. During that call, Trump claimed without evidence that election fraud had occurred in Fulton County—Georgia's most populous county and home to the state's largest number of Black residents. He invoked false claims about out-of-state voters, dead voters, drop box stuffing, and compromised election equipment. Then came the line that would be quoted in congressional hearings, legal filings, and news reports for years to come: "What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

The specificity of that number—11,780—lingers in the memory. Not a round figure, not a vague demand, but a precise calculation of exactly what would be needed to flip the state's electoral votes. The Brennan Center for Justice documented the litany of false claims Trump advanced during that call, each one designed to create pressure, each one unsupported by evidence. The call represented a moment when the boundaries between legitimate political action and attempted subversion of electoral process became dangerously unclear.

Special Counsel Jack Smith's January 2025 report concluded that Trump's efforts to unlawfully retain power after losing the 2020 election compelled prosecution. The indictment alleged that Trump had conspired to overturn the election by spreading knowingly false claims of fraud and creating pro-Trump slates of fake electors in battleground states to obstruct the certification of results. PBS NewsHour reported on the four crimes the January 6th Committee urged the Justice Department to consider prosecuting. The legal machinery of accountability had been set in motion.

But then came the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. United States (2024), establishing that former presidents possess absolute immunity for actions within their conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority, and presumptive immunity for official acts. The legal landscape for election interference cases had been fundamentally altered. What had seemed like potential consequences now seemed like historical footnotes. The planets, in their patient way, had already been tracking this trajectory.

The Saturn-Neptune conjunction of 2026 is not occurring in isolation. It is accompanied by Pluto's position at approximately 4.46 degrees Aquarius on February 26, 2026, forming an opposition to Trump's natal Pluto near 10-11 degrees Leo in his birth chart dated June 14, 1946. In mundane astrology, Pluto oppositions to natal placements of political figures often correlate with intense power struggles and transformational crises. The transit, which will continue through the election period, suggests that questions of electoral legitimacy and the transfer of power will remain central themes.

Pluto moves slowly, taking approximately 248 years to complete one orbit around the Sun. Its opposition to a natal placement is not a fleeting aspect but a prolonged encounter with forces of transformation and power. For a figure whose political identity has been built around the assertion of power—over opponents, over narratives, over institutions—this opposition represents a celestial mirror reflecting back the consequences of that approach. The question is not whether transformation will occur, but what form it will take.

The election day chart for November 3, 2026, presents a complex picture that rewards careful study. Saturn will have advanced to approximately 9.16 degrees Aries, while Neptune trails at around 2.04 degrees Aries, maintaining their conjunction influence. The Sun at roughly 10.58 degrees Scorpio forms a square to the Saturn-Neptune axis, suggesting tension between the desire for deep truth and the persistence of confusion. Jupiter at about 24.56 degrees Leo creates a trine to the Aries conjunction, potentially amplifying ideological convictions and the sense of righteous purpose.

Pluto at approximately 3.14 degrees Aquarius on election day remains within orb of opposition to Trump's natal Pluto, indicating that themes of power transformation and institutional challenge will persist. The Moon at roughly 25.21 degrees Leo speaks to public emotional investment in leadership narratives, while Mercury retrograde at about 14.26 degrees Scorpio warns of potential communication breakdowns and the need for careful scrutiny of information. A retrograde Mercury in Scorpio—the sign associated with secrets, hidden truths, and transformation—suggests that what emerges in the days surrounding the election may require patient excavation to understand fully.

The 2026 election cycle includes particular complexities that add texture to this already charged environment. A special election will be held to fill the remaining two years of the six-year Senate term won by Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) in 2022, following his assumption of office as Secretary of State. In Virginia, political parties may choose to nominate candidates by convention rather than by primary election, adding another layer of procedural variation to an already complex electoral map. These details matter because they represent the specific mechanisms through which larger forces—political, social, celestial—manifest in concrete outcomes.

Federal law establishes that "the Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November, in every even numbered year, is established as the day for the election, in each of the States and Territories of the United States, of Representatives and Delegates to the Congress." This seemingly mundane statutory language becomes charged with significance when viewed through the lens of the current moment. The regularity of the electoral calendar persists regardless of the celestial configurations above or the political turmoil below. The machinery of democracy grinds forward, asking only that citizens participate and that their participation be counted accurately.

But accurate counting requires consensus about what counts as accurate. The Saturn-Neptune conjunction in Aries speaks directly to this challenge. Saturn represents structure, boundaries, rules, and established authority. Neptune represents dissolution, dreams, illusions, and the transcendence of boundaries. When these two archetypal forces meet in the sign of the warrior, the result can be a period when the very structures that give meaning to collective action become subject to radical reinterpretation.

The historical precedent for such concerns is well-documented. The January 6th Select Committee found that tens of millions of Americans had been persuaded that the 2020 election was stolen—a persuasion that did not require evidence in the traditional sense because it operated on a different register entirely. It operated on the register of identity, of belonging, of loyalty to a particular vision of America and its rightful leadership. Neptune's influence is precisely this: the power of belief that transcends evidence, the dream that refuses to be dissolved by mere facts.

The Supreme Court's immunity ruling in Trump v. United States added another dimension to this Neptunian fog. By establishing that former presidents possess immunity for official acts, the Court created a zone of protection around certain categories of presidential conduct. The boundary between official and unofficial acts became the new contested territory—a boundary that Saturn would structure but Neptune might dissolve. What counts as an official act? Who gets to decide? These questions remain unresolved, creating space for continued contestation.

The astrological configuration suggests that these questions will not be resolved cleanly. The square from the Scorpio Sun to the Saturn-Neptune conjunction on election day indicates tension that may not find easy resolution. Scorpio demands truth, but it also understands that truth is often buried beneath layers of deception and self-deception. The retrograde Mercury in Scorpio adds another layer: communication may be compromised, information may be incomplete, and what seems clear on the surface may prove more complex upon investigation.

Yet the Jupiter trine to the Saturn-Neptune conjunction offers a different note. Jupiter in Leo, forming a harmonious aspect to the Aries conjunction, suggests the possibility of expansive conviction, of ideological certainty that provides meaning even amid confusion. This could manifest as genuine democratic renewal—the assertion of civic values and participation that transcends the current turmoil. Or it could manifest as the amplification of particular narratives that serve to consolidate power rather than distribute it. Jupiter does not discriminate between noble and ignoble expansion; it simply amplifies what it touches.

For those tracking these alignments in their own charts, our chart tool provides personalized transit analysis that can reveal how these larger patterns interact with individual configurations. The value of such analysis lies not in prediction but in preparation—understanding the terrain through which one must navigate, the challenges and opportunities that particular configurations present.

The Saturn-Neptune conjunction in Aries, occurring alongside Pluto's opposition to Trump's natal Pluto, creates an astrological signature that mirrors the political moment with uncanny precision. Boundaries between truth and fabrication dissolve, institutional authority faces transformational challenge, and the collective must navigate between competing versions of reality. The question is not whether these celestial patterns will manifest in earthly events—that is already happening. The question is how individuals and institutions will respond to the challenges they present.

The January 6th Select Committee spoke of "the unity of our Nation and the perpetuity of our institutions" as values worth defending. These are Saturnian values: structure, continuity, the preservation of established forms. But they are being tested by Neptunian forces: the dissolution of consensus, the transcendence of established boundaries, the power of dreams and delusions to reshape reality. The outcome of this test will determine not just the results of the 2026 midterms but the shape of American democracy for years to come.

Pluto's opposition to Trump's natal placement suggests that this test will be personal as well as institutional. The planet of transformation does not pass by without demanding change. Whether that change takes the form of accountability, reinvention, or something else entirely remains to be seen. But the transit indicates that the period through the 2026 election represents a critical passage in the relationship between power and consequence, between assertion and limitation.

The midterms will arrive on schedule, as federal law requires. Citizens will vote, or they will not. Votes will be counted, or they will not. The machinery of democracy will either function as designed or it will malfunction in ways that reveal deeper structural problems. The planets will continue their courses regardless of these outcomes, indifferent to human affairs but somehow reflecting them back with unsettling clarity.

What the Saturn-Neptune conjunction in Aries offers is an opportunity to see clearly the relationship between structure and dissolution, between the forms we create and the forces that would unmake them. What Pluto's opposition offers is an encounter with power in its most transformative aspect—not the power to dominate but the power to change, to be changed, to emerge from crisis as something different than what entered it.

The 2026 midterms will be a test of American democracy. The astrology suggests it will also be a test of American capacity for truth-telling, for distinguishing between Saturn's structures and Neptune's dreams, for finding within the confusion a path toward genuine rather than illusory renewal. The planets do not care about American politics. But they seem to be watching, and their patterns suggest that what happens in November will reverberate far beyond the immediate results.

Whether these celestial patterns manifest as democratic resilience or institutional stress remains uncertain. But the correspondence between planetary positions and political developments offers a framework for understanding the deeper currents at play—currents that run beneath the surface of daily news cycles, beneath the strategic calculations of political actors, beneath the immediate concerns of any single election. These are the currents of history itself, moving with the patience of the outer planets, asking questions that will not be answered quickly or easily.